在
独立写作
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people have no influence on important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. "1)本题属于TOEFL写作常考的隐藏绝对词题型/生活方式话题
2)建议写作思路：不同意这一说法。理由1：年轻人的思维更活跃，与社会发展紧密接轨，会有很多很好的想法;理由2：现在很多行业的领头人也是非常年轻的，他们用实际行动改变了世界。"
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People live better when move out hometown. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. "1)本题属于TOEFL写作常考的对比题型/生活方式话题
2)建议写作思路：倾向于同意这一说法。文章可以采取让步转折的思路，先承认在家乡会生活更便利，但长期看还是搬出家乡更好。理由1：如果去大城市，能够得到更好的工作机会，开阔眼界，学到更多;理由2：脱离之前的人际生活方式，少了很多交际，会有更多时间学习新东西。"
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The young people today are facing more personal and work-related challenges than their parents did fifty years ago. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. "1)本题属于TOEFL写作常考的对比题型/生活方式类话题
2)建议写作思路：同意该说法。理由1：因为随着社会发展，人口增加，社会竞争更严重，现代年轻人的生存压力和同龄时候他们的父母比更大;理由2：现在的年轻人也有更多新的需求和自我要求。"
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who do not work because they have enough money are rarely happy. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. "1)本题属于TOEFL写作常考的隐藏绝对词题型/生活方式类话题
2)建议写作思路：不同意该说法。理由1：因为有很多钱而不工作人未必就是无所事事，而是有资源有资本去做自己更感兴趣的事情，可能会更快乐;理由2：金钱消费本身就能带来快乐，而且正确的金钱消费带来的可能还不是肤浅的快乐，比如救助那些需要帮助的人，这种快乐和满足和劳动和工作带来的快乐是不一样的。"
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past people ate foods that was better for their health than people today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. "1)本题属于TOEFL写作常考的对比题型/生活方式话题
2)建议写作思路：不同意该说法。理由1：现在的食物多样性更多，人们能够获取的营养成分更多;理由2：现代人对食物的研究更深刻更广泛，他们有更大的选择权去吃对身体健康更有益处的食物。"
综合写作
题目：犀牛角非常的珍贵，以至于一些偷猎者不惜一切代价地猎杀犀牛，对犀牛的种群数量造成了严重的影响。为了保护犀牛，人们想出一种办法：把犀牛运到别的栖息地(relocation plan) ,防止偷猎者的捕杀。阅读和听力讨论这种 relocation 的方法是否有效。
阅读：阅读：relocation 对保护犀牛没有用。 1. 犀牛在 relocation 的过程中有 2%-5%的死亡率。众所周知，犀牛是濒危物种，因此在运输过程中造成犀牛死亡，这中做法是不可取的。 2. 犀牛有着非常紧密的种族社会关系，如果把犀牛 relocate 的话，就会造成公犀牛和母犀牛的数量不平衡，会对犀牛的繁殖造成影响，此外它们的种族纽带也会被切断。 3. relocation 不能完全防止偷猎者猎杀犀牛，因为犀牛角的价值很高，所以就算把犀牛运到别的地方偷猎者还是会紧随不放，所以不能从根本上解决问题。
听力：听力： relocation 可以很好地保护犀牛种群。 1. 虽然犀牛在运输途中不可避免地会发生伤亡，但是死亡的犀牛毕竟是少数。特别是把运输途中犀牛死亡率和盗猎者猎杀犀牛导致的死亡率对比时，会发现运输途中犀牛死亡数量远远低于盗猎者猎杀犀牛的数量。相比两种情况，还是 relocation 更好一些。 2. 阅读中所提到的犀牛性别不平衡问题在进行 relocation 之前就可以避免。保护者们会挑选一定数量的公犀牛和母犀牛，保持比例平衡。另外带着幼崽的母犀牛不会进行 relocation，不会拆散它们的社会关系。 3. 把犀牛运到别的地方，那里地域广阔，犀牛有很大的活动空间，盗猎者在如此大的范围之内发现犀牛非常困难。另外，有些地方人很难通过，偷猎者无法到达。
题目：讨论健康计划 Wellness Programs(即公司推出奖励计划给达到 healthy-related goal 的员工) 是否对员工有益。
阅读： Wellness Programs in United States bring lots of benefits to companies and employees. 1. The programs can become a motivational tool for people to lose weight and quit smoking, bringing much healthier lifestyle. 2. Employees will be more inclined to take exercises and have wholesome diets through the motivation of the Wellness Programs. 3. Although the program might cost companies a great deal of money at beginning, it saves more compared to the spending for employees’ sickness.
听力： The program does not work. 1. The program may be an effective way to motivate employees in short term, but it cannot keep for a long period. Research shows that after several years, people are back to their bad habits. 2. The program is not fair for every employee, because cases differ. Some who have to take care of their family or cope with chores do not have enough time to exercise, while others are genetically fat. 3. Companies might suffer great financial loss in long term, because many employees will not stay in one company forever
...
